Free Essay: Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case – Main Managerial Problem On the surface, the seven-member MGI team which comprised of Henry Tam and. The case study is about the process of team working and processes to be followed to understand your peers and constructively work with them. Case Questions: Henry Tam and the MGI Team 1. a) What is your evaluation of the MGI s team processes? b) What were the root causes of the problems?.
|Published (Last):||16 February 2007|
|PDF File Size:||14.18 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Are the differences among the team members an asset or liability? Alex also stated that Sasha has very strong ideas about things and is not open to others. We were not even sure what we were selling. Finally, their group lacks greatly in having clear stages of development.
How about receiving a customized one? Thus, members in the group may get confused and unclear with certain actions arise. It is also critical at this juncture for Henry to amd work he has taken on to others in the group such as Dav who are well suited to the tasks but underutilized.
The founders were Sasha, Igor, and Roman. Establish Meeting Agendas to maintain goal focus Rationale: Conflict builds as the team generates a range of ideas about how to market their product, but has trouble agreeing on which ideas to pursue. Members are interested in getting to know each other and discovering what is considered accepted twam in determining the real task of the group, and in determining group rules pg.
Henry Tam & the MGI Team by Samuel Pearson on Prezi
MGI had collaborators from many different backgrounds that provided many of the expertises and skill sets that they needed. Henry could have broken that faultline by splitting the group he belonged to and being creative with other members. Cade the end of the case, what actions could Henry take? Henry does a lot of market hejry and believes the product should be marketed to teachers and education market.
Within a short time frame, seven diverse team members assemble to write a business plan for a new company and struggle to define their roles, make decisions together, and resolve conflict.
Dana and Henry were the Americans and were looked as interns by Russian Sasha instead of team leaders. The members think their personalities are effective in the group, and will not be eager to change. Summary of Team analysis Based on our analysis, we believe that the MGI team comprises of people with different background, and are also elites.
The leader could also have created project deadlines to make sure that the team met the contest deadlines.
He has to step in to establish better management of agreements and build unity and encourage collaboration through supporting, empathizing, and harmonizing. We’ll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
Henry Tam & MGI Team Case Essay
For example, Dav Clark was not introduced until the third meeting. The team did a poor job of making decision and assigning roles. A group of highly talented people does not mean guaranteed success. Henry could also have suggested bringing a trained facilitator into the group to help with organizing the scattered brainstorming into productive decision making. Roman and Igor are from Ukraine, whereas Sasha is from St. Sasha should try to accommodate his needs regarding group meetings and group activity.
Ta Answer is very helpful for Us Thank you a lot! Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website.
Henry Tam/MGI Case
Advantageous roles are defined by the text as the powerful and interrelated of task-facilitating and relationship building roles among effective teams. The blurring roles caused to team to remain inefficient.
Rationale There would also be csae discussions in regarding how to proceed. This is not a problematic situation; in fact it could actually be advantageous. Henry Tam, the only American, rounded out the initial team. He provided a lot of energy, but the exact same traits caused tension. Click to learn more https: Having a team created from many different schools of thought can be an advantage when finding innovative ideas.
Dana will present an idea knowing Teqm will disagree.
An Analysis of Henry Tam and the MGI Team
Dana and Sasha were also sharing a negative chemistry, as Roman recalls pg. Roman is disagreeable; Sasha and Igor believe there are too many people involved. In my view, and in order to get MGI working towards success whomever is the leader should organize MGI in such a manner so as to maximize each member’s strengths.
Henry could have noticed that they lacked a leader, and no one on the team had specific roles. The team had several potential strengths. Therefore, the group fails to achieve timeliness. With this being said, role clarification was very poor and team members did not apply their skills as well as they could have with direction.